The sovereign wealth funds that last share a handful of design choices, and none of them depends on being large. They separate the fund from the annual budget, write down how much can be spent and when, diversify widely, report openly, and hold to a mandate measured in generations. A Tribal Nation can adopt every one of those practices at its own scale. That's the most useful lesson the sovereign fund model offers, and it's a governance lesson more than an investment one.
A sovereign wealth fund is a promise to the future
A sovereign wealth fund is capital a government sets aside, invests for the long term, and protects from being spent on today's needs. The point is to turn a revenue stream that may not last, such as oil, minerals, or a single dominant industry, into a permanent asset that keeps producing income after the original source fades.
Norway's Government Pension Fund Global is the best-known example. It ended 2024 at 19,742 billion kroner, according to its manager, Norges Bank Investment Management, and it is invested entirely outside Norway. Its defining feature is a budgetary rule, set at 3 percent of the fund's value since 2017, that limits how much the government can draw each year to roughly the fund's expected real return. The fund was built from oil revenue. The rule is designed so it outlives oil.
Closer to home, the Alaska Permanent Fund was created by a 1976 amendment to the state constitution to save a share of oil revenue. It reached a record $85.1 billion on June 30, 2025, according to the Alaska Permanent Fund Corporation. The constitution protects the fund's principal, and a share of its earnings pays an annual dividend to residents.
Five practices the durable funds share
The International Forum of Sovereign Wealth Funds maintains the Santiago Principles, 24 voluntary practices its members agree to follow on legal framework, governance, and investment and risk management. Read alongside the funds that have lasted, they point to five habits.
- Separate the fund from the operating budget. The money sits in its own institution with its own managers, so it can't be drawn down to cover a shortfall without a deliberate decision. Norway's fund is managed by its central bank at arm's length from the annual budget.
- Write down a spending rule. A fixed, public formula decides what can be spent and when, so the decision isn't relitigated every year. Norway's 3 percent rule is one version. A rule that spends only income and never principal is another.
- Diversify. The fund invests across asset classes, industries, and geographies, and above all away from the industry that created the wealth. A fund built from oil that invests in oil doubles its exposure.
- Report openly. Annual reports, published holdings, and stated benchmarks let the people the fund serves see how it's run. The Santiago Principles ask members to assess themselves against the standards every two years.
- Hold a generational mandate. The fund's purpose is written for people who aren't born yet. For many Native Nations, that horizon is already familiar as the seven-generation principle: decisions weighed by their effect on those who come long after.
How sovereign funds use private markets
Long-horizon funds can do something most investors can't: hold assets that take a decade to pay off and can't be sold quickly. That patience is why sovereign funds hold meaningful allocations to private equity and venture capital, where returns depend on time and manager selection.
The Alaska Permanent Fund's board set an 18 percent target for private equity for fiscal year 2025, alongside 32 percent in public equities and 20 percent in fixed income. Singapore's Temasek reported a net portfolio value of 434 billion Singapore dollars for the year ended March 31, 2025, with 23 percent held through partnerships, funds, and asset management companies. Both treat private markets as a measured slice of a diversified whole, sized to what the fund can hold through a full cycle and spread across many companies and sectors.
A venture allocation fits the same logic at any scale. It is illiquid, long, and widely dispersed in its outcomes, which makes it suitable only for capital that genuinely won't be needed for years, and only through diversification across many companies and vintages.
Native institutions already doing this
Native Nations didn't need to borrow the idea. Several built their own versions long ago.
The Navajo Nation Council established the Navajo Nation Permanent Trust Fund in 1985, seeded with about $26 million and funded by a requirement that 12 percent of tribal revenue be deposited each year. The Council barred any spending for its first 20 years. Since the fund matured in 2006, 95 percent of its annual income can be spent under a five-year plan the Council approves, and 5 percent is reinvested; the principal stays untouched. The plan for fiscal years 2022 through 2026 provides up to $40 million a year toward the Nation's comprehensive budget. That is a separate fund, a written spending rule, and a generational horizon, all set by the Nation itself.
The Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act of 1971 took a different path. It transferred about 44 million acres and $962.5 million to Alaska Native regional and village corporations owned by Alaska Native shareholders. Those corporations operate as permanent capital: businesses and investment portfolios meant to serve shareholders and their descendants across generations.
The Chickasaw Nation runs its diversification through Sovereign Native Holdco, its investment subsidiary, which in 2024 launched Pennington Creek Capital, a Dallas-based private equity firm investing in established middle-market companies. Each of these Nations and corporations designed its structure around its own goals, governance, and resources. There's no single template, and there shouldn't be.
What doesn't transfer
Scale is the obvious difference. Most Nations will never run a fund the size of Norway's or Alaska's, and they don't need to. The practices above work at any size; what changes is how much a Nation can diversify on its own, which is one reason pooled vehicles exist.
Political pressure transfers completely. In 2016, Alaska's governor vetoed half the money set aside for that year's dividend, and in 2017 the Alaska Supreme Court upheld the veto, ruling that the fund's earnings are subject to the normal appropriation process because only the principal is constitutionally protected. The lesson for any sovereign fund is that the protections need to be written as firmly as the government that sets them can make them, and that the line between principal and income has to be drawn precisely.
The tension between today's needs and tomorrow's is real, and it belongs to each Nation to resolve. When the Navajo Generating Station was set to close in 2019, Navajo Nation President Jonathan Nez described the Permanent Trust Fund this way: "The Permanent Fund was developed for the future down the road, and we're in the future now." A fund designed well gives a Nation the ability to make that choice deliberately, under its own rules, instead of under pressure.
What a Nation gains
The sovereign fund model offers Tribal Nations a proven set of practices for turning current success into permanent capital: a separate institution, a written spending rule, diversification away from the industries that created the wealth, open reporting, and a generational mandate. None of it requires a fund the size of a country's.
Native Capital is built to make the diversification part easier. Its Fund-of-Funds engine holds LP stakes across a curated set of venture funds, spreading exposure across many companies and vintages without a Nation having to build its own investment office. Each engine is a sleeve: a separate allocation inside the one Fund, with its own strategy and reporting. The pillars on economic independence and ownership in the future economy take the next steps. If your council is designing or revisiting a long-term fund, send us a message about a Venture 101 session, or request the investor deck.
Sources
- Norges Bank Investment Management, Government Pension Fund Global annual report 2024.
- Alaska Permanent Fund Corporation, 2025 Annual Report press release, September 2025, and Board of Trustees asset allocation for fiscal year 2025.
- International Forum of Sovereign Wealth Funds, Santiago Principles (Generally Accepted Principles and Practices).
- Temasek Review 2025, July 2025.
- Navajo Nation Council, Budget and Finance Committee update on the Permanent Trust Fund Income Five-Year Expenditure Plan, 2020, and fiscal year 2022 to 2026 plan legislation, 2021.
- "We're in the future now," Navajo Times, February 14, 2019.
- Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act, 1971 (via Sealaska Corporation and congressional sources).
- Chickasaw Nation, Pennington Creek Capital announcement, Business Wire, March 13, 2024.
- "Alaska Supreme Court upholds Gov. Walker's 2016 veto of half of Permanent Fund dividend," Anchorage Daily News, August 25, 2017.